JavaScript is disabled. Please enable to continue!

Mobile search icon
Food Testing >> Resources >> Case Study: Scaling a Nutritional Formula from Bench-Top to Full Production

Case Study: Scaling a Nutritional Formula from Bench-Top to Full Production

Sidebar Image

Client Challenge

After months of meticulous formulation work in the lab which involved perfecting flavor, mouthfeel, appearance, and active ingredient balance, a new nutritional product was ready for scale-up. The team had optimized every detail in small batches and was confident in the formula’s readiness for commercial production.

Objective

Transition the formula from bench-top batches (a few liters) to full-scale manufacturing (hundreds to over 1,000 gallons) while maintaining product integrity and quality.

Process Overview

  • Manufacturer Selection: A contract manufacturer was chosen based on equipment compatibility, ingredient handling capabilities, and quality protocols.
  • Raw Material Procurement: All ingredients were sourced and verified for consistency with lab-grade inputs.
  • Batch Preparation: Water was added to both the main and hot mixing tanks, replicating the bench-top process.

Challenges Encountered

  1. Unexpected Foaming During Mixing
  • Observation: Significant foaming occurred during the addition of early ingredients—nearly overflowing the tank.
  • Cause: Likely due to increased shear forces at scale, which were not present during lab development.
  • Mitigation: On-site antifoam agents were used to control the issue, allowing the batch to proceed.
  1. Holding Tank Dwell Time
  • Situation: After QC approval, the batch was transferred to a holding tank with cooling capacity.
  • Delay: Packaging was postponed due to ongoing production of another item, resulting in a 24–36-hour dwell time.
  • Concern: Certain ingredients were known to be heat-sensitive, and this delay introduced risk of degradation—an untested variable in the lab.
  1. Packaging Line Disruptions
  • Foaming During Fill: More pronounced than in lab conditions but manageable.
  • Color Shift: Product appeared slightly tan, raising questions about thermal impact or ingredient interaction.
  • Flow Drop: Mid-run, the inline filter clogged due to insoluble particles from a key active ingredient.
  • Resolution: Filter was cleared, but uncertainty remained about how much active was lost during the blockage.

Outcome

The production run yielded thousands of cases, marking a significant milestone in the commercialization journey. However, several deviations from the bench-top formulation were observed, raising questions about consistency and long-term product performance:

  • Appearance and Color Variation: The final product exhibited a noticeable tan hue, diverging from the original lab version. This shift may be attributed to thermal exposure during extended dwell time or ingredient interactions at scale.
  • Potential Loss of Active Ingredient: A mid-run clog in the inline filter, caused by insoluble particles from a key active, halted flow and required manual intervention. While the line resumed, the quantity of active lost remains uncertain, potentially impacting efficacy.
  • Unanticipated Process Variables:
  • Foaming: Excessive foam during mixing and filling, likely due to increased shear forces, introduced risk of overflow and slowed operations.
  • Dwell Time: The product sat in a warm holding tank for up to 36 hours before packaging, far longer than lab conditions, raising concerns about degradation of sensitive ingredients.
  • Filtration Challenges: The clogging incident revealed the need for better understanding of ingredient solubility and filtration compatibility at scale.

These issues underscore the complexity of scaling a formula and the importance of anticipating how process dynamics can influence product quality.

Key Takeaway

While direct scale-up from bench-top to full production is achievable, it carries significant risk without intermediate validation. This case illustrates why pilot plant trials are a critical step in the commercialization process. By simulating production conditions at a smaller scale, teams can:

  • Identify shear-related effects that may alter texture, foam behavior, or ingredient dispersion.
  • Evaluate ingredient stability under realistic dwell times, thermal exposure, and holding conditions.
  • Validate filtration and packaging dynamics, ensuring that actives remain intact, and equipment can handle the formulation without disruption.

A well-planned pilot run not only reduces uncertainty, it protects brand integrity, minimizes costly rework, and builds confidence in the final product’s performance across the supply chain.

 

Connect with an expert.

Additional Resources

Case Study: Product Line Development for Functional Teas
Scaling Emerging Food & Beverage Brands: Three Priorities for Private Equity Firms
https://www.eurofinsus.com/food-testing